Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pforzheim, Germany"

From Geohashing
imported>Ekorren
(Considering saturday or monday)
imported>Ekorren
(2009-05-29?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Upcoming locations, plans ==
 
== Upcoming locations, plans ==
  
Both 2009-05-16 (saturday) and 2009-05-18 (monday) are reachable but no "must go" locations for me. Anyone else planning something in this graticule this weekend? --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 14:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
+
=== 2009-05-29 ===
 +
 
 +
... is a [[Holy hash]] at Baiersbronn. Very easy location if using public transport or bike. Anyone interested? I might go... but I'm not sure yet. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 16:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 
  
 
== Old and deprecated naming talk ==
 
== Old and deprecated naming talk ==

Revision as of 16:43, 28 May 2009

Upcoming locations, plans

2009-05-29

... is a Holy hash at Baiersbronn. Very easy location if using public transport or bike. Anyone interested? I might go... but I'm not sure yet. --Ekorren 16:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


Old and deprecated naming talk

This page should be renamed/joined to/with Karlsruhe, Germany by largest city policy. Karlsruhe is only partly in this graticule but it is more than double the size of Pforzheim. Karlsruhe isn't the largest city in the bordering graticule so there is no name collision. I created Karlsruhe because that graticule was not in All Graticules and discovered Pforzheim only later.

I would object. Naming a graticule after Karlsruhe makes its location ambiguous, and the city is not large enough (compared to its surrounding cities, e.g. Mannheim) to name the two graticules after it, making it a split city. lyx suggested naming it Karlsruhe (South). I don't care strongly, but I'd opt for Pforzheim. -- Relet 13:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)