Difference between revisions of "Dziwnów, Poland"
From Geohashing
imported>ReletBot m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-(\[http://irc.*?\?)date=\{\{LOCALYEAR\}\}-\{\{LOCALMONTH\}\}-\{\{LOCALDAY2\}\}&(lat.*?location\]) +\1\2)) |
imported>Srs0 m (Land Usage) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
{{graticule | {{graticule | ||
| lat= 54 | | lat= 54 | ||
Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
* a virtually impossible graticule for a Danish Land Geohash (island of Bornholm, north-eastern corner), about 0.05 km<sup>2</sup> (about 0.0007% of total graticule area) | * a virtually impossible graticule for a Danish Land Geohash (island of Bornholm, north-eastern corner), about 0.05 km<sup>2</sup> (about 0.0007% of total graticule area) | ||
(Areas and percentages were calculated by eye and hand and may be a little off, but should give a fair idea). | (Areas and percentages were calculated by eye and hand and may be a little off, but should give a fair idea). | ||
+ | |||
+ | According to [[Land usage]], the chance for your hash to fall into one of the following areas is: | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | 99.09% Water | ||
+ | 0.65% Fields | ||
+ | 0.16% Forests | ||
+ | 0.04% Natural reserves | ||
+ | 0.04% Roads | ||
+ | 0.01% Highways | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
== Expeditions == | == Expeditions == |
Revision as of 10:47, 31 August 2009
Malmö, Sweden | Rønne, Denmark | Nexø, Denmark |
Stralsund, Germany | Dziwnów | Kołobrzeg |
Neubrandenburg, Germany | Szczecin | Stargard Szczeciński |
Today's location: geohashing.info google osm bing/os kml crox |
The graticule
This graticule is at latitude 54, longitude 14. It is currently inactive. It is
- a not-so-easy graticule for a Polish Land Geohash (south-eastern corner, about 1% of total graticule area)
- a difficult graticule for a German Land Geohash (south-western corner, about 0,3% of total graticule area = once a year)
- a virtually impossible graticule for a Danish Land Geohash (island of Bornholm, north-eastern corner), about 0.05 km2 (about 0.0007% of total graticule area)
(Areas and percentages were calculated by eye and hand and may be a little off, but should give a fair idea).
According to Land usage, the chance for your hash to fall into one of the following areas is:
99.09% Water 0.65% Fields 0.16% Forests 0.04% Natural reserves 0.04% Roads 0.01% Highways
Expeditions
none