imported>Meghan (your province is bigger than mine.) |
imported>Starbird |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The only thing I can think of is that BC is so wide it fills up the screen, and your grat #s have to go downward. Other than that I'll have to specify the cell heights, and my brain is not in coding-mode at the moment. --[[User:Meghan|Meghan]] 19:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | :The only thing I can think of is that BC is so wide it fills up the screen, and your grat #s have to go downward. Other than that I'll have to specify the cell heights, and my brain is not in coding-mode at the moment. --[[User:Meghan|Meghan]] 19:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Yes, that's right. The cells in both tables look the same to me, if I make my browser window wide enough. In some sense the cells ''should'' be taller than they are wide, so that the map is the same shape as the province. But this is perhaps not so important in the "all north all the time" provinces. --[[User:Starbird|starbird]] 19:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:55, 9 March 2009
99, eh? "If one of those graticules should happen to fall..." Nice map. --starbird18:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I can't see what you've done differently that makes my graticules tall and yours wide. Perhaps someone else can spot it. -Robyn 19:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- The only thing I can think of is that BC is so wide it fills up the screen, and your grat #s have to go downward. Other than that I'll have to specify the cell heights, and my brain is not in coding-mode at the moment. --Meghan 19:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, that's right. The cells in both tables look the same to me, if I make my browser window wide enough. In some sense the cells should be taller than they are wide, so that the map is the same shape as the province. But this is perhaps not so important in the "all north all the time" provinces. --starbird 19:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)