Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-05-10 50 -120"
From Geohashing
imported>Robyn (Is that all the photos?) |
imported>Robyn (→Sabiston / Sabastion) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Aww, does this mean none of the deer boinging over fences shots worked out? -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] | Aww, does this mean none of the deer boinging over fences shots worked out? -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | No, they're both photos of deer landing on the other side of fences. I can upload one of those if you like, but it's not obvious that they jumped the fence. -- [[User:Rhonda|Rhonda]] 05:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Sabiston / Sabastion == | ||
+ | |||
+ | If I remember correctly, it was something like this: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Google maps called it Sabiston Creek road | ||
+ | * Dad's backroads mapbook called it Sabastion Creek road | ||
+ | * The sign on the highway said Sabastion Creek road | ||
+ | * Dad's backroads mapbook showed a creek called Sabiston Creek | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm not sure whether the creek or the road was mis-spelled in which map, but I'm pretty sure the sign on the road said Sabastion. -- [[User:Rhonda|Rhonda]] 21:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :No wonder we didn't take it as an omen. :-) |
Latest revision as of 21:46, 13 May 2009
Aww, does this mean none of the deer boinging over fences shots worked out? -Robyn
No, they're both photos of deer landing on the other side of fences. I can upload one of those if you like, but it's not obvious that they jumped the fence. -- Rhonda 05:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Sabiston / Sabastion
If I remember correctly, it was something like this:
- Google maps called it Sabiston Creek road
- Dad's backroads mapbook called it Sabastion Creek road
- The sign on the highway said Sabastion Creek road
- Dad's backroads mapbook showed a creek called Sabiston Creek
I'm not sure whether the creek or the road was mis-spelled in which map, but I'm pretty sure the sign on the road said Sabastion. -- Rhonda 21:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- No wonder we didn't take it as an omen. :-)