Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-05-31 51 -0"
From Geohashing
imported>Norsemark |
imported>Norsemark |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:If you look at the tracklog, you can see that he got at least as close as 25 m. --[[User:Ilpadre|ilpadre]] 19:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC) | :If you look at the tracklog, you can see that he got at least as close as 25 m. --[[User:Ilpadre|ilpadre]] 19:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::Couldn't stand on the Hashpoint as it was inaccessible (see the 5th pic on the gallery). The G1 grab was taken before just because I happened to check out how far it was to go and took a photo, and didn't think to get another once I got there, stupidly enough (and also as you can see I was having problems with reflection, and resigned to poor quality). No problems if it doesn't qualify - I didn't even realise it would be a stand-out distance! | + | ::Couldn't stand on the Hashpoint as it was inaccessible (see the 5th pic on the gallery). The G1 grab was taken before just because I happened to check out how far it was to go and took a photo, and didn't think to get another once I got there, stupidly enough (and also as you can see I was having problems with reflection, and resigned to poor quality). No problems if it doesn't qualify - I didn't even realise it would be a stand-out distance! --[[User:Norsemark|norsemark]] 19:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:19, 16 June 2009
Wait, did you get to the coordinates, or did you only get 1521' away? I sympathize if the latter, I did a similar distance walk hash and didn't get there, because I took the wrong road, aaaarrrgh! -Robyn 18:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- If you look at the tracklog, you can see that he got at least as close as 25 m. --ilpadre 19:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Couldn't stand on the Hashpoint as it was inaccessible (see the 5th pic on the gallery). The G1 grab was taken before just because I happened to check out how far it was to go and took a photo, and didn't think to get another once I got there, stupidly enough (and also as you can see I was having problems with reflection, and resigned to poor quality). No problems if it doesn't qualify - I didn't even realise it would be a stand-out distance! --norsemark 19:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
