Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010-07-24 38 -92"
From Geohashing
imported>Greenslime m |
imported>Octo |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Did you mean the challenge to be for just "California", or for "California, MO" ?? I'd predict more success with the former, but then again, our challenge for "Vancouver" hasn't happened yet, and I thought that was a shoo-in. :-) [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 05:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | :Did you mean the challenge to be for just "California", or for "California, MO" ?? I'd predict more success with the former, but then again, our challenge for "Vancouver" hasn't happened yet, and I thought that was a shoo-in. :-) [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 05:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I agree, keep it general. [[User:Greenslime|Greenslime]] 06:10, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ::I agree, keep it general. [[User:Greenslime|Greenslime]] 06:10, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I meant it for just "California," I stuck the "MO" on there so people would realize we hadn't actually done the state. I guess I'll take it off. [[User:Octo|Octo]] | ||
Revision as of 22:25, 26 July 2010
Hey, how about launching a A Tale of Two Hashes challenge for your California hash? Greenslime 08:27, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Great idea, thanks!
- Good luck, just like fishing, its only a matter of time :) Greenslime 01:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Did you mean the challenge to be for just "California", or for "California, MO" ?? I'd predict more success with the former, but then again, our challenge for "Vancouver" hasn't happened yet, and I thought that was a shoo-in. :-) Jiml 05:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, keep it general. Greenslime 06:10, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- I meant it for just "California," I stuck the "MO" on there so people would realize we hadn't actually done the state. I guess I'll take it off. Octo
