Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010-08-01 -38 144"
From Geohashing
imported>Relet |
imported>Relet |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Heh nice, pity it (probably) won't count. I wonder how many other hashes like this have real proof... [[User:Talex|Talex]] 08:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC) | Heh nice, pity it (probably) won't count. I wonder how many other hashes like this have real proof... [[User:Talex|Talex]] 08:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | Yup. A Deja-vu is something you realize (or believe) that you remember it from the past the moment you see it. Hence the requirement to revisit it. (And the wiki would be flooded with 'been-there's if there was no actual geohashing involved. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 07:16, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | + | Yup. A Deja-vu is something you realize (or believe) that you remember it from the past the moment you see it. Hence the requirement to revisit it. (And the wiki would be flooded with 'been-there's if there was no actual geohashing involved.) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 07:16, 3 August 2010 (UTC) |
| + | :You're absolutely right. In so many ways. What could I have been thinking? [[User:Stevage|Stevage]] 03:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Ooh, snarky! Sorry for putting you off. I like the fact that you can prove being there, and absolutely don't mind you taking a ribbon for that (There's the fully customizable [[Gratuitous ribbon]] for all those amazing things that happen which haven't been accounted for). But I also know how irritating it is for some people who have claimed an achievement when other people don't follow the requirements, and confusing for others who read your 'proof' and think that's the way to do it. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 07:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:24, 4 August 2010
Heh nice, pity it (probably) won't count. I wonder how many other hashes like this have real proof... Talex 08:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Yup. A Deja-vu is something you realize (or believe) that you remember it from the past the moment you see it. Hence the requirement to revisit it. (And the wiki would be flooded with 'been-there's if there was no actual geohashing involved.) -- relet 07:16, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right. In so many ways. What could I have been thinking? Stevage 03:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ooh, snarky! Sorry for putting you off. I like the fact that you can prove being there, and absolutely don't mind you taking a ribbon for that (There's the fully customizable Gratuitous ribbon for all those amazing things that happen which haven't been accounted for). But I also know how irritating it is for some people who have claimed an achievement when other people don't follow the requirements, and confusing for others who read your 'proof' and think that's the way to do it. -- relet 07:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
