Difference between revisions of "Talk:Most active Geohashers/old"

Revision as of 14:47, 6 April 2015

Thank you for this page! --Q-Owl (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2015 (EST)

Seconded. Would be nice if this could be automated, and for that matter, extended back to the start. --Thomcat (talk) 16:44, 14 January 2015 (EST)

I'm currently working my way through past years (at July 2013 at the moment). When I have the whole year done it will be added to the totals. I'm also planning to give each year a sub-page so it will be easy to look back and see totals and monthly leaders without clogging the main page too badly. Fear not, it will get there in time. Mystrsyko (talk) 22:32, 14 January 2015 (EST)

Hello Mystrsyko,
at "Most Active Users By Coordinates Reached" (bottom of the page):
I think, I found only 4 hashes in November 2014.
Best greetings
--Q-Owl (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2015 (EST)

I'm wondering how you deal with an expedition where one geohasher reached the coordinates and another did not. I'm also wondering if the Category:Coordinates reached (or not) could be replaced with a template that included the date, graticule and user name. Then the stats would be much easier to work out. How hard would it be to retro-edit all the expeditions to follow this format? Or is there an easier way to solve this problem? In all cases thanks for your effort and the interesting results. --Sourcerer (talk) 05:26, 5 March 2015 (EST)

I just found this page. I'll automate it. --NWoodruff (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2015 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:26, 5 March 2015 (view source) imported>Sourcerer m (→‎User stats questions) ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:47, 6 April 2015 (view source) imported>NWoodruff Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I'm wondering how you deal with an expedition where one geohasher reached the coordinates and another did not. I'm also wondering if the Category:Coordinates reached (or not) could be replaced with a template that included the date, graticule and user name. Then the stats would be much easier to work out. How hard would it be to retro-edit all the expeditions to follow this format? Or is there an easier way to solve this problem? In all cases thanks for your effort and the interesting results. --[[User:Sourcerer\|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer\|talk]]) 05:26, 5 March 2015 (EST)		I'm wondering how you deal with an expedition where one geohasher reached the coordinates and another did not. I'm also wondering if the Category:Coordinates reached (or not) could be replaced with a template that included the date, graticule and user name. Then the stats would be much easier to work out. How hard would it be to retro-edit all the expeditions to follow this format? Or is there an easier way to solve this problem? In all cases thanks for your effort and the interesting results. --[[User:Sourcerer\|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer\|talk]]) 05:26, 5 March 2015 (EST)
		+
		+
		+	I just found this page. I'll automate it. --[[User:NWoodruff\|NWoodruff]] ([[User talk:NWoodruff\|talk]]) 10:47, 6 April 2015 (EDT)