Difference between revisions of "Talk:2016-02-29 41 -79"
From Geohashing
imported>Pedalpusher (comment!) |
imported>Jiml (Thumbs up on categories.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Thanks, Tilley. I know it's a long read, but I do feel better just getting all that out there. Glad you agree with the ribbon. Any thoughts on the not reached Category? I'm starting to think both are valid. [[User:Pedalpusher|Pedalpusher]] ([[User talk:Pedalpusher|talk]]) 09:24, 3 March 2016 (EST) | :Thanks, Tilley. I know it's a long read, but I do feel better just getting all that out there. Glad you agree with the ribbon. Any thoughts on the not reached Category? I'm starting to think both are valid. [[User:Pedalpusher|Pedalpusher]] ([[User talk:Pedalpusher|talk]]) 09:24, 3 March 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I agree with the ribbon/categories: The technology got you started the wrong way and Mother Nature finished you off. I know how frustrating it can be - I've had expeditions that were just a complete comedy of errors. :-) [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] ([[User talk:Jiml|talk]]) 15:54, 3 March 2016 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:54, 3 March 2016
An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis -part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get Blinded by Science -ribbon, since you told you based your decision of following the wrong path on the satellite images. Tilley (talk) 08:41, 3 March 2016 (EST)
- Thanks, Tilley. I know it's a long read, but I do feel better just getting all that out there. Glad you agree with the ribbon. Any thoughts on the not reached Category? I'm starting to think both are valid. Pedalpusher (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2016 (EST)
