Difference between revisions of "Talk:2016-02-29 41 -79"

From Geohashing
imported>Tilley
(Created page with "An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis -part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get B...")
 
imported>Pedalpusher
(it's kinda funny...)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis -part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get Blinded by Science -ribbon, since you told you based your decision of following the wrong path on the satellite images. [[User:Tilley|Tilley]] ([[User talk:Tilley|talk]]) 08:41, 3 March 2016 (EST)
+
An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get Blinded by Science ribbon, since you told you based your decision of following the wrong path on the satellite images. [[User:Tilley|Tilley]] ([[User talk:Tilley|talk]]) 08:41, 3 March 2016 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:Thanks, Tilley. I know it's a long read, but I do feel better just getting all that out there. Glad you agree with the ribbon. Any thoughts on the not reached Category? I'm starting to think both are valid. [[User:Pedalpusher|Pedalpusher]] ([[User talk:Pedalpusher|talk]]) 09:24, 3 March 2016 (EST)
 +
 
 +
:I agree with the ribbon/categories:  The technology got you started the wrong way and Mother Nature finished you off.  I know how frustrating it can be - I've had expeditions that were just a complete comedy of errors.    :-)  [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] ([[User talk:Jiml|talk]]) 15:54, 3 March 2016 (EST)
 +
 
 +
It's kinda funny now that I think about it...I drove 2 hours, went sloshing through water and didn't reach an imaginary point, and not once did I question what I was doing. I think I just earned this category... [[User:Pedalpusher|Pedalpusher]] ([[User talk:Pedalpusher|talk]]) 09:42, 5 March 2016 (EST)
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Addicted to geohashing]]

Latest revision as of 14:42, 5 March 2016

An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get Blinded by Science ribbon, since you told you based your decision of following the wrong path on the satellite images. Tilley (talk) 08:41, 3 March 2016 (EST)

Thanks, Tilley. I know it's a long read, but I do feel better just getting all that out there. Glad you agree with the ribbon. Any thoughts on the not reached Category? I'm starting to think both are valid. Pedalpusher (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2016 (EST)
I agree with the ribbon/categories: The technology got you started the wrong way and Mother Nature finished you off. I know how frustrating it can be - I've had expeditions that were just a complete comedy of errors.  :-) Jiml (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2016 (EST)

It's kinda funny now that I think about it...I drove 2 hours, went sloshing through water and didn't reach an imaginary point, and not once did I question what I was doing. I think I just earned this category... Pedalpusher (talk) 09:42, 5 March 2016 (EST)