Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Spain"
From Geohashing
imported>Gormaz |
imported>Fippe (Yes, go for it.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't know where to discuss this, but I'll just leave it here in case anyone sees it and, if it's not the case, I'll ask around later. Well, I was thinking that, even though it's not such a big country, it would quite cleaner and easier to browse if graticules where categorized by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_communities_of_Spain Comunidad Autónoma] (sort of the equivalent of states in the USA). There are some which probably just spawn a few graticules, but others are quite big. [[User:Gormaz|Gormaz]] ([[User talk:Gormaz|talk]]) 14:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC) | I don't know where to discuss this, but I'll just leave it here in case anyone sees it and, if it's not the case, I'll ask around later. Well, I was thinking that, even though it's not such a big country, it would quite cleaner and easier to browse if graticules where categorized by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_communities_of_Spain Comunidad Autónoma] (sort of the equivalent of states in the USA). There are some which probably just spawn a few graticules, but others are quite big. [[User:Gormaz|Gormaz]] ([[User talk:Gormaz|talk]]) 14:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC) | ||
:Another thing favoring this categorization is that it would make it easier to keep track of the [[Regional geohashing achievement]]. [[User:Gormaz|Gormaz]] ([[User talk:Gormaz|talk]]) 16:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC) | :Another thing favoring this categorization is that it would make it easier to keep track of the [[Regional geohashing achievement]]. [[User:Gormaz|Gormaz]] ([[User talk:Gormaz|talk]]) 16:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I think the category and map for Spain should be kept, but if you want to add categories and maps for the regions, that sure would be useful for regional geohash aspirants. [[Germany/States|Germany has this too.]] (Well, the maps, not the categories.) You can use the model that Canada and the USA use and make a new page for each region, or use the German model and put them all in one page. --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 15:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:09, 4 October 2018
I don't know where to discuss this, but I'll just leave it here in case anyone sees it and, if it's not the case, I'll ask around later. Well, I was thinking that, even though it's not such a big country, it would quite cleaner and easier to browse if graticules where categorized by Comunidad Autónoma (sort of the equivalent of states in the USA). There are some which probably just spawn a few graticules, but others are quite big. Gormaz (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Another thing favoring this categorization is that it would make it easier to keep track of the Regional geohashing achievement. Gormaz (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think the category and map for Spain should be kept, but if you want to add categories and maps for the regions, that sure would be useful for regional geohash aspirants. Germany has this too. (Well, the maps, not the categories.) You can use the model that Canada and the USA use and make a new page for each region, or use the German model and put them all in one page. --Fippe (talk) 15:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
