Difference between revisions of "2020-10-13 53 9"

From Geohashing
(Created page with "{{meetup graticule|lat=53|lon=9|date=2020-10-13}} ==Location== In some brables next to a tree by a field in Kisdorf, Schleswig-Holstein ==Participants== *User:π π π|π...")
 
(Photos)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
==Participants==
 
==Participants==
*[[User:π π π|π π π]] ([[User talk:Gumbledalf|talk]])
+
*[[User:π π π|π π π]] ([[User talk:π π π|talk]])
  
 
==Expedition==
 
==Expedition==
After I‘d missed by chance for an easy Walk Geohash back in 2018 when it was only 1.7 km away, I knew had to get the achievement for this one, which was only 3.5 km from my home, the second closest yet. Also, since it lay so conveniently at the edge of a field by some easily recognisable trees, I figured I could get a No Batteries Geohash as well. So I printed out a map and the location of the hash on two different satellite images. But I had misestimated the sunset time, so I only left at 6 pm and it got dark on my way there. Armed with a powerful torch and severely overequipped against the cold, I walked the 3.5 km and arrived in darkness.
+
After I‘d missed my chance for an easy Walk Geohash back in 2018 when it was only 1.7 km away, I knew had to get the achievement for this one, which was only 3.5 km from my home, the second closest yet. Also, since it lay so conveniently at the edge of a field by some easily recognisable trees, I figured I could get a No Batteries Geohash as well. So I printed out a map and the location of the hash on two different satellite images. But I had misestimated the sunset time, so I only left at 6 pm and it got dark on my way there. Armed with a powerful torch and severely overequipped against the cold, I walked the 3.5 km and arrived in darkness.
  
 
Thankfully and against my expectations, I could easily identify the trees from the satellite image and was able to find the right location almost at once. A path led through brambles to the street 45 m away, but the hash was located 25 from it, so I first had to switch to a smaller path and then climb across some nasty brambles that stuck to my overcoat. I went onto the adjecent field to estimate the distance between the trees, and was able to locate the exact position of the marker on the geohashing.info satellite map with a precision of less than 1 m thanks to the hashpoint being located less than half a metre from the connection line of the two trees. I briefly got startled by two birds, probably partridges, that emerged from the brambles just a I was about to step on them (it was very dark), then found a position I deemed acceptable and took out my phone to get a screenshot of the coordinates (note that I did not use my phone to navigate in any way). I took some very dark pictures and then went to the position of the Google Maps satellite map marker which was located about 3 m off (for whatever reason), and took another screenshot. The coordinates show that I was less than 5 m off at the first position and less than 4 m at the second, though the coordinates are only accurate up to 5 m.
 
Thankfully and against my expectations, I could easily identify the trees from the satellite image and was able to find the right location almost at once. A path led through brambles to the street 45 m away, but the hash was located 25 from it, so I first had to switch to a smaller path and then climb across some nasty brambles that stuck to my overcoat. I went onto the adjecent field to estimate the distance between the trees, and was able to locate the exact position of the marker on the geohashing.info satellite map with a precision of less than 1 m thanks to the hashpoint being located less than half a metre from the connection line of the two trees. I briefly got startled by two birds, probably partridges, that emerged from the brambles just a I was about to step on them (it was very dark), then found a position I deemed acceptable and took out my phone to get a screenshot of the coordinates (note that I did not use my phone to navigate in any way). I took some very dark pictures and then went to the position of the Google Maps satellite map marker which was located about 3 m off (for whatever reason), and took another screenshot. The coordinates show that I was less than 5 m off at the first position and less than 4 m at the second, though the coordinates are only accurate up to 5 m.
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
==Photos==
 
==Photos==
will follow shortly (19 pictures)
+
<gallery>
<gallery perrow="5">
+
File:2020-10-13 53 9 12.jpg | location 1
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 13.jpg | location 2
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 1.jpg | near the hash
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 2.jpg | same
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 3.jpg | the hash (location 1)
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 4.jpg | surroundings
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 5.jpg | too dark for panorama
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 6.jpg | direction 3
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 7.jpg | π π π
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 9.jpg | π π π in light
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 10.jpg | the map I used to navigate
 +
File:2020-10-13 53 9 11.jpg | the hash (location 2)
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  

Latest revision as of 16:18, 6 September 2022

Tue 13 Oct 2020 in 53,9:
53.8132587, 9.9922298
geohashing.info google osm bing/os kml crox


Location

In some brables next to a tree by a field in Kisdorf, Schleswig-Holstein

Participants

Expedition

After I‘d missed my chance for an easy Walk Geohash back in 2018 when it was only 1.7 km away, I knew had to get the achievement for this one, which was only 3.5 km from my home, the second closest yet. Also, since it lay so conveniently at the edge of a field by some easily recognisable trees, I figured I could get a No Batteries Geohash as well. So I printed out a map and the location of the hash on two different satellite images. But I had misestimated the sunset time, so I only left at 6 pm and it got dark on my way there. Armed with a powerful torch and severely overequipped against the cold, I walked the 3.5 km and arrived in darkness.

Thankfully and against my expectations, I could easily identify the trees from the satellite image and was able to find the right location almost at once. A path led through brambles to the street 45 m away, but the hash was located 25 from it, so I first had to switch to a smaller path and then climb across some nasty brambles that stuck to my overcoat. I went onto the adjecent field to estimate the distance between the trees, and was able to locate the exact position of the marker on the geohashing.info satellite map with a precision of less than 1 m thanks to the hashpoint being located less than half a metre from the connection line of the two trees. I briefly got startled by two birds, probably partridges, that emerged from the brambles just a I was about to step on them (it was very dark), then found a position I deemed acceptable and took out my phone to get a screenshot of the coordinates (note that I did not use my phone to navigate in any way). I took some very dark pictures and then went to the position of the Google Maps satellite map marker which was located about 3 m off (for whatever reason), and took another screenshot. The coordinates show that I was less than 5 m off at the first position and less than 4 m at the second, though the coordinates are only accurate up to 5 m.

I briefly considered going for a Tron achievement, but ultimately decided against it because I would have had to climb through many more brambles to avoid the way I came. So I continued my audiobook and set off again on the same path, passing some very brightly illuminated football fields, but having to use my torch for most of the way back. In retrospect, this hash would also have been perfect for a Midnight Geohash on the previous night. Oh well. This was my first expedition in the dark where I could freely choose the time.

Photos

Achievements

Land geohash

Walk.PNG
π π π earned the Walk geohash Achievement
by reaching the (53, 9) geohash on 2020-10-13 on foot.
Compass.jpg
π π π earned the No Batteries Geohash Achievement
by reaching the (53, 9) geohash on 2020-10-13.