Difference between revisions of "Talk:Polyhash achievement"
From Geohashing
(Adding thoughts to proposed achievements) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*<b>Oppose.</b> Can you oppose your own proposal? There is a lot of overlap between the polyhash and consecutive achievements. I think it makes more sense to use the consecutive ribbon with no change to the rules and add fields for the total number of attempts and coordinates reached. So you'd need to reach a hashpoint on each consecutive day. If you attempt or reach more the ribbon can record it. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 05:38, 19 December 2015 (EST) | *<b>Oppose.</b> Can you oppose your own proposal? There is a lot of overlap between the polyhash and consecutive achievements. I think it makes more sense to use the consecutive ribbon with no change to the rules and add fields for the total number of attempts and coordinates reached. So you'd need to reach a hashpoint on each consecutive day. If you attempt or reach more the ribbon can record it. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 05:38, 19 December 2015 (EST) | ||
*'''Oppose''' purely due to what Sourcerer said above as well as how complex the achievement itself is. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 02:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | *'''Oppose''' purely due to what Sourcerer said above as well as how complex the achievement itself is. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 02:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | :* I've added a fourth ribbon variant to the [[Consecutive geohash achievement]]. It incorporates Sourcerer's idea without changing anything about the original achievement itself. As such, this achievement will be rejected. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 15:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:11, 3 April 2024
- Support. It reminds me of the periodic table with the number of consecutive hashing days as the atomic number and the number of (reached/attempted?) hashes as the mass number. So if you hash on 3 consecutive days and doing 2 double hashes during this time, you'd achieve a 53Li (with a radioactive half-live of 3,047 × 10−22). I'd prefer to count only reached hashes (as for the consecutive and the multi hash achievement) but I wouldn't insist on that. DODO (talk) 13:12, 27 November 2015 (EST)
- Oppose. Can you oppose your own proposal? There is a lot of overlap between the polyhash and consecutive achievements. I think it makes more sense to use the consecutive ribbon with no change to the rules and add fields for the total number of attempts and coordinates reached. So you'd need to reach a hashpoint on each consecutive day. If you attempt or reach more the ribbon can record it. --Sourcerer (talk) 05:38, 19 December 2015 (EST)
- Oppose purely due to what Sourcerer said above as well as how complex the achievement itself is. --KerrMcF (talk) 02:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- I've added a fourth ribbon variant to the Consecutive geohash achievement. It incorporates Sourcerer's idea without changing anything about the original achievement itself. As such, this achievement will be rejected. --KerrMcF (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
