Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fibonacci achievement"
PeterRoder (talk | contribs) m (Forgot to sign) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Oppose'''. We already have [[Two to the N achievement|Two to the N]], and I don't see the point of having two different ways of counting the same thing. If it was counting something different, I might support. --[[User:PeterRoder|PeterRoder]] ([[User talk:PeterRoder|talk]]) 22:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC) | '''Oppose'''. We already have [[Two to the N achievement|Two to the N]], and I don't see the point of having two different ways of counting the same thing. If it was counting something different, I might support. --[[User:PeterRoder|PeterRoder]] ([[User talk:PeterRoder|talk]]) 22:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose'''. Would not oppose it if it was combined with the Two to the N achievement to make a general counting achievement, but this may be controversial amongst people who enjoy that achievement as it is. This suggestion alone does not have enough uniqueness for an achievement. --[[User:KerrMcF|KerrMcF]] ([[User talk:KerrMcF|talk]]) 02:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose''' as a standalone achievement per PeterRoder, do not oppose as addition to the Two to the N achievement. --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 02:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Possible Addition to Two to the N == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've made a gratuitous ribbon to demonstrate what this achievement would look like if paired with the Two to the N achievement. This would not alter the previous or future ribbons for the Two to the N achievement but due to the similarities between the two achievements, it makes sense to add it as an additional feature. I have not changed the Two to the N achievement but would be willing to do so should this be supported. Due to the nature of the gratuitous ribbons, the achievement text does not match 1-to-1. This would not be the case for the actual achievement. The achievement would use the format F<sub>0</sub> = 0, F<sub>1</sub> = 1, F<sub>2</sub> = 1, F<sub>3</sub> = 2, etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <code>{{Two to the N achievement | ||
| + | | count = 3 | ||
| + | | latitude = 56 | ||
| + | | longitude = -3 | ||
| + | | date = 2024-02-20 | ||
| + | | name = KerrMcF | ||
| + | | reached = true | ||
| + | }}</code> | ||
| + | |||
| + | appears as: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Two to the N achievement | ||
| + | | count = 3 | ||
| + | | latitude = 56 | ||
| + | | longitude = -3 | ||
| + | | date = 2024-02-20 | ||
| + | | name = KerrMcF | ||
| + | | reached = true | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Adding true to a 'fibonacci' factor would change the achievement: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <code>{{Two to the N achievement | ||
| + | | count = 6 | ||
| + | | latitude = 56 | ||
| + | | longitude = -3 | ||
| + | | date = 2024-02-20 | ||
| + | | name = KerrMcF | ||
| + | | reached = true | ||
| + | | fibonacci = true | ||
| + | }}</code> | ||
| + | |||
| + | would appear as: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{gratuitous ribbon | ||
| + | | color = skyblue | ||
| + | | icon = FibonacciIcon.png | ||
| + | | latitude = 56 | ||
| + | | longitude = -3 | ||
| + | | date = 2024-02-20 | ||
| + | | achievement = Fibonacci achievement | ||
| + | | description = reaching F<sub>'''6'''</sub> hashpoints on [[2024-02-20 56 -3]] and is promoted to '''Level 6''' (Coordinates reached).<br> | ||
| + | | name = KerrMcF | ||
| + | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:55, 16 May 2024
Oppose. We already have Two to the N, and I don't see the point of having two different ways of counting the same thing. If it was counting something different, I might support. --PeterRoder (talk) 22:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Oppose. Would not oppose it if it was combined with the Two to the N achievement to make a general counting achievement, but this may be controversial amongst people who enjoy that achievement as it is. This suggestion alone does not have enough uniqueness for an achievement. --KerrMcF (talk) 02:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Oppose as a standalone achievement per PeterRoder, do not oppose as addition to the Two to the N achievement. --Fippe (talk) 02:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible Addition to Two to the N
I've made a gratuitous ribbon to demonstrate what this achievement would look like if paired with the Two to the N achievement. This would not alter the previous or future ribbons for the Two to the N achievement but due to the similarities between the two achievements, it makes sense to add it as an additional feature. I have not changed the Two to the N achievement but would be willing to do so should this be supported. Due to the nature of the gratuitous ribbons, the achievement text does not match 1-to-1. This would not be the case for the actual achievement. The achievement would use the format F0 = 0, F1 = 1, F2 = 1, F3 = 2, etc.
{{Two to the N achievement
| count = 3
| latitude = 56
| longitude = -3
| date = 2024-02-20
| name = KerrMcF
| reached = true
}}
appears as:
Adding true to a 'fibonacci' factor would change the achievement:
{{Two to the N achievement
| count = 6
| latitude = 56
| longitude = -3
| date = 2024-02-20
| name = KerrMcF
| reached = true
| fibonacci = true
}}
would appear as:
 |
KerrMcF earned the Fibonacci achievement
|
