Difference between revisions of "Talk:Graticule Unlocked"
From Geohashing
imported>CJ (Question) |
imported>Robyn (my vote on origin is no) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Does a successful [[Origin Geohash|Origin Geohash]] count as a Virgin Graticule award, if no-one has ever achieved a hash in the graticule previously? --[[User:CJ|CJ]] 06:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC) | Does a successful [[Origin Geohash|Origin Geohash]] count as a Virgin Graticule award, if no-one has ever achieved a hash in the graticule previously? --[[User:CJ|CJ]] 06:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I would say no. I wouldn't count it myself. I see the Origin (or Displaed Origin) as a back-up geohash for the day that you can't get to the real geohash. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 12:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:27, 31 August 2008
What is sufficient proof of being there? I just found out I wasn't the first in the Dortmund graticule(51 7) yesterday, but there was no page of the Dortmund graticule before I created it. And the real first hash contains no pictures or proof in any other form.--Arvid 10:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- I looked at the geohash in question, and think it's a planning page. At least until somebody decides to post their story there. Someday I hope to post a table somewhere, but until then here's my worksheet --Thomcat 17:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Does a successful Origin Geohash count as a Virgin Graticule award, if no-one has ever achieved a hash in the graticule previously? --CJ 06:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- I would say no. I wouldn't count it myself. I see the Origin (or Displaed Origin) as a back-up geohash for the day that you can't get to the real geohash. -Robyn 12:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
