Difference between revisions of "Talk:Frozen Geohash"
From Geohashing
imported>Wmcduff (Weather report is proof?) |
imported>Das aug |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would a screen capture of the weather report of the day with the high below 0 C be enough proof for this award? There are some places in Canada where a winter geohash pretty much gets this award by default. :) -[[User:Wmcduff|Wmcduff]] 02:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | Would a screen capture of the weather report of the day with the high below 0 C be enough proof for this award? There are some places in Canada where a winter geohash pretty much gets this award by default. :) -[[User:Wmcduff|Wmcduff]] 02:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would say if you are geohashing somewhere with a reported daily high below zero, that you don't have to produce a thermometer to prove it. But hey, even Resolute was +1 today. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 02:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What if I have a movie with somebody with lots of snowflakes in his beard? - [[User:das_aug|das_aug]] 10:44, 24 November 2008 (MET) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:44, 24 November 2008
Would a screen capture of the weather report of the day with the high below 0 C be enough proof for this award? There are some places in Canada where a winter geohash pretty much gets this award by default. :) -Wmcduff 02:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I would say if you are geohashing somewhere with a reported daily high below zero, that you don't have to produce a thermometer to prove it. But hey, even Resolute was +1 today. -Robyn 02:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
What if I have a movie with somebody with lots of snowflakes in his beard? - das_aug 10:44, 24 November 2008 (MET)
