Difference between revisions of "Talk:Enschede, Netherlands"
From Geohashing
imported>Arvid (answer to benjw) |
imported>Fippe (→Reachability: Starting on 2019-07-07, passenger trains will go to Neuenhaus, meaning that the Lower Saxon part of this graticule will become reachable by train.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Just to fit in with everything else, should this perhaps be renamed to "Enschede, Netherlands" or something? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | Just to fit in with everything else, should this perhaps be renamed to "Enschede, Netherlands" or something? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
: Yes it should. And I should add about a handful of hashes there. --[[User:Arvid|Arvid]] 19:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | : Yes it should. And I should add about a handful of hashes there. --[[User:Arvid|Arvid]] 19:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Reachability== | ||
| + | Starting on 2019-07-07, passenger trains will go to [[wikipedia:Neuenhaus#Transport|Neuenhaus]], meaning that the Lower Saxon part of this graticule will become reachable by train. --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 12:40, 15 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:40, 15 June 2019
Umm, Losser, is it contained by the enschede graticule?
- No, Losser is in the teeny tiny Dutch (Overijssel) part of the Ems, Germany graticule. I have tried one hash there: 2008-08-26 52 7. Regards --Arvid 18:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Country designation
Just to fit in with everything else, should this perhaps be renamed to "Enschede, Netherlands" or something? -- Benjw 19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes it should. And I should add about a handful of hashes there. --Arvid 19:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Reachability
Starting on 2019-07-07, passenger trains will go to Neuenhaus, meaning that the Lower Saxon part of this graticule will become reachable by train. --Fippe (talk) 12:40, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
