Difference between revisions of "Talk:Forster, Australia"
From Geohashing
imported>Ekorren (→Active or inactive) |
imported>CJ (I agree with inactive) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Given that the only hash activity in this graticule was by people visiting, which is it? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 19:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | Given that the only hash activity in this graticule was by people visiting, which is it? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 19:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I left it in that case since there is no definite definition of "Active". See ongoing discussion in Category Talk and IRC. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 19:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | :I left it in that case since there is no definite definition of "Active". See ongoing discussion in Category Talk and IRC. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 19:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I agree that it should be classed as inactive (and I have now changed it to that). Also reminded me that now I am back from holidays I must write up the report for our holiday geohash which is listed...--[[User:CJ|CJ]] 00:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:54, 28 January 2009
Active or inactive
Given that the only hash activity in this graticule was by people visiting, which is it? -- Benjw 19:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I left it in that case since there is no definite definition of "Active". See ongoing discussion in Category Talk and IRC. --Ekorren 19:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that it should be classed as inactive (and I have now changed it to that). Also reminded me that now I am back from holidays I must write up the report for our holiday geohash which is listed...--CJ 00:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
