Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-03-23 52 0"
imported>Splitdipless |
imported>Jiml m (No discussion needed) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Arbitration needed == | == Arbitration needed == | ||
| − | + | ||
''... I walked up to the gate to the back garden, at which point the GPS read 3.65m to go. I didn't want to open the gate and charge into their back garden without permission, so I didn't go any further, but I noticed when I got back to the car that the GPS accuracy was hovering around 4m. So... did I get the geohash or not?'' | ''... I walked up to the gate to the back garden, at which point the GPS read 3.65m to go. I didn't want to open the gate and charge into their back garden without permission, so I didn't go any further, but I noticed when I got back to the car that the GPS accuracy was hovering around 4m. So... did I get the geohash or not?'' | ||
Latest revision as of 06:02, 27 May 2011
Arbitration needed
... I walked up to the gate to the back garden, at which point the GPS read 3.65m to go. I didn't want to open the gate and charge into their back garden without permission, so I didn't go any further, but I noticed when I got back to the car that the GPS accuracy was hovering around 4m. So... did I get the geohash or not?
Would welcome other geohashers' opinions on this. Thanks. — Benjw [talk] 11:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Personally I think it's first of all a matter of the geohasher himself being convinced that he reached the coordinates, but you may also want to check the comments here. --Crox 21:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I'd say you made it. If you didn't have a GPS, and were using Google Maps, I can't imagine you'd be anymore accurately "there". Jiml 01:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Don't take our word for it. GPS_Accuracy spells out exactly how accurate you may be. In general, your device is always a little less accurate then what it says it is. Based on the description, you absolutely got it. Splitdipless 17:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
