Difference between revisions of "Talk:XKCD-100 Honorable Mention"
imported>Haberdasher m (Support) |
imported>GeorgDerReisende (Answer) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Support''' - seems reasonable enough. You're still making the effort to go that far regardless of the date and time. -[[User:Haberdasher|Haberdasher]] 01:55, 18 June 2012 (EDT) | '''Support''' - seems reasonable enough. You're still making the effort to go that far regardless of the date and time. -[[User:Haberdasher|Haberdasher]] 01:55, 18 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Support''' - For pretty much the same reasons already listed. - [[User:DrCanadianNinja|DrCanadianNinja]] 11:53, 21 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Support''' - Dito. - [[User:TroLLorT|TroLLorT]] 14:22, 12 January 2014 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is it 100 miles one-way or there-and-back? -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 13:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It counts from your first step to the hash. Not back. --[[User:GeorgDerReisende|GeorgDerReisende]] ([[User talk:GeorgDerReisende|talk]]) 15:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Deletion tag == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reason stated: duplication on the main XKCD-100 page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reason for non-deletion: there is a copy on the main achievement page as it is based off it, It was done to get exposure so I piggybacked onto the main achievement. This page must exisit for this separate achievement to be valid. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This achievement also has unanimous support and when I'm back from camping I will now move to make this a propper achievement. | ||
| + | I ''(unsigned contribution by [[User:TunezNZ]])'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | :You're right. But then I wonder why this was put onto the main XKCD-100 page without having been officially approved. No matter, deletion proposal withdrawn. --[[User:Calamus|Calamus]] 17:27, 30 December 2012 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 22 May 2017
Support - but I think that the "XKCD" should be removed from the name. -- RedHatter 22:32, 17 June 2012 (EDT)
The reason for the name is that it steams from the main achievement XKCD-100 TunezNZ 23:41, 17 June 2012 (EDT)
Support - Good idea, why only have an achievement for Saturdays at 4? -- RedHatter 01:33, 18 June 2012 (EDT)
Support - seems reasonable enough. You're still making the effort to go that far regardless of the date and time. -Haberdasher 01:55, 18 June 2012 (EDT)
Support - For pretty much the same reasons already listed. - DrCanadianNinja 11:53, 21 June 2012 (EDT)
Support - Dito. - TroLLorT 14:22, 12 January 2014 (EST)
Is it 100 miles one-way or there-and-back? -- Malgond (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- It counts from your first step to the hash. Not back. --GeorgDerReisende (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Deletion tag
Reason stated: duplication on the main XKCD-100 page.
Reason for non-deletion: there is a copy on the main achievement page as it is based off it, It was done to get exposure so I piggybacked onto the main achievement. This page must exisit for this separate achievement to be valid.
This achievement also has unanimous support and when I'm back from camping I will now move to make this a propper achievement. I (unsigned contribution by User:TunezNZ)
- You're right. But then I wonder why this was put onto the main XKCD-100 page without having been officially approved. No matter, deletion proposal withdrawn. --Calamus 17:27, 30 December 2012 (EST)
