Difference between revisions of "Talk:2013-01-12 48 11"
From Geohashing
imported>The T-Man (Getting those graticule stats back up) |
imported>Zertrin (answer) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nice one, when I read your original plan I totally didn't grasp the fact that those two were so beautifully connectible. -[[User:The T-Man|The T-Man]] 17:04, 13 January 2013 (EST) | Nice one, when I read your original plan I totally didn't grasp the fact that those two were so beautifully connectible. -[[User:The T-Man|The T-Man]] 17:04, 13 January 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | : Indeed, actually I discovered this opportunity as I'm always using [http://tjum.anthill.de/cgi-bin/geohash.cgi?t=1&nr=o&unit=km&zoom=11%2F5&zoom=10%2F4&type=hybrid&lat=48.12&lon=11.49&size=360x360 Anthill's tool] to check for the hashpoints and I noticed that two of the images were almost the same, but on two different graticules. See you hopefully soon at another hashpoint and let's push the stats up :) — [[User:Zertrin|Zertrin]] 17:13, 13 January 2013 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:13, 13 January 2013
Nice one, when I read your original plan I totally didn't grasp the fact that those two were so beautifully connectible. -The T-Man 17:04, 13 January 2013 (EST)
- Indeed, actually I discovered this opportunity as I'm always using Anthill's tool to check for the hashpoints and I noticed that two of the images were almost the same, but on two different graticules. See you hopefully soon at another hashpoint and let's push the stats up :) — Zertrin 17:13, 13 January 2013 (EST)
