Difference between revisions of "Talk:2019-02-21 53 9"
From Geohashing
(Created page with "You make a good point. I would support an achievement for reaching hashes inside buildings. Makes sense as a category of itself. Would be interesting to hear (read) what other...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You make a good point. I would support an achievement for reaching hashes inside buildings. Makes sense as a category of itself. Would be interesting to hear (read) what others think about it. --[[User:SastRe.O|SastRe.O]] ([[User talk:SastRe.O|talk]]) 13:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | You make a good point. I would support an achievement for reaching hashes inside buildings. Makes sense as a category of itself. Would be interesting to hear (read) what others think about it. --[[User:SastRe.O|SastRe.O]] ([[User talk:SastRe.O|talk]]) 13:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I think in most cases it is covered by the [[Ambassador achievement]], unless you use [[2015-09-19 52 9|questionable methods]]. The only buildings where this does not apply are public buildings and quasi-public buildings (like supermarkets). It may be worth discussing if this should be considered a distinct achievement. --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 14:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:13, 2 April 2020
You make a good point. I would support an achievement for reaching hashes inside buildings. Makes sense as a category of itself. Would be interesting to hear (read) what others think about it. --SastRe.O (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think in most cases it is covered by the Ambassador achievement, unless you use questionable methods. The only buildings where this does not apply are public buildings and quasi-public buildings (like supermarkets). It may be worth discussing if this should be considered a distinct achievement. --Fippe (talk) 14:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
