Difference between revisions of "Talk:Land usage"
From Geohashing
imported>Jevanyn |
imported>Robyn (Is it easy to do?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===Requests for scans=== | ===Requests for scans=== | ||
Can I make a request for Land Usage scans of a couple of graticules? I'd like someone to run [[Cape May, New Jersey]] again, and [[Fort Fisher, North Carolina]] would be much appreciated as well. "kthxbai" -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 18:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | Can I make a request for Land Usage scans of a couple of graticules? I'd like someone to run [[Cape May, New Jersey]] again, and [[Fort Fisher, North Carolina]] would be much appreciated as well. "kthxbai" -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 18:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Ooh, yes please, me too, if someone enjoyes running these things. I'd love to see Vancouver, British Columbia, Surrey, British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia and Fort Nelson, British Columbia get this treatment. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 18:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 17 June 2009
That's nice. Neat idea. I like the "rather close to a road" interpretation.
Requests for scans
Can I make a request for Land Usage scans of a couple of graticules? I'd like someone to run Cape May, New Jersey again, and Fort Fisher, North Carolina would be much appreciated as well. "kthxbai" -- Jevanyn 18:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ooh, yes please, me too, if someone enjoyes running these things. I'd love to see Vancouver, British Columbia, Surrey, British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia and Fort Nelson, British Columbia get this treatment. -Robyn 18:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
