Difference between revisions of "Talk:Enschede, Netherlands"
From Geohashing
imported>Benjw |
imported>Arvid (answer to benjw) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Just to fit in with everything else, should this perhaps be renamed to "Enschede, Netherlands" or something? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | Just to fit in with everything else, should this perhaps be renamed to "Enschede, Netherlands" or something? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Yes it should. And I should add about a handful of hashes there. --[[User:Arvid|Arvid]] 19:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:28, 19 January 2009
Umm, Losser, is it contained by the enschede graticule?
- No, Losser is in the teeny tiny Dutch (Overijssel) part of the Ems, Germany graticule. I have tried one hash there: 2008-08-26 52 7. Regards --Arvid 18:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Country designation
Just to fit in with everything else, should this perhaps be renamed to "Enschede, Netherlands" or something? -- Benjw 19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes it should. And I should add about a handful of hashes there. --Arvid 19:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
