Difference between revisions of "Talk:Migration Geohash"
From Geohashing
imported>Robyn (How about meet 50 people, but not necessarily all at one geohash?) |
imported>UnwiseOwl |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
So should we delete it, or change it to meeting 50 geohashers, cumulatively, one at a time if necessary? -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 03:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | So should we delete it, or change it to meeting 50 geohashers, cumulatively, one at a time if necessary? -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 03:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, that wouldn't be migration. | ||
| + | I figure this could only happen if the hash occurred at a major event, and the count included non-hashers. I liek the idea of a meeting hashers award, but she it as something quite different to this. | ||
| + | Hashers in my grat:3 | ||
| + | Hashers I've met:1 (It was me) -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:09, 30 October 2008
Okay, this achievement has been listed on the main page for a long time and no one has wanted it or made a page for it. That's because no one thinks they'll ever see 50 people at a geohash.
So should we delete it, or change it to meeting 50 geohashers, cumulatively, one at a time if necessary? -Robyn 03:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, that wouldn't be migration. I figure this could only happen if the hash occurred at a major event, and the count included non-hashers. I liek the idea of a meeting hashers award, but she it as something quite different to this. Hashers in my grat:3 Hashers I've met:1 (It was me) -- UnwiseOwl 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
