Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Alternate algorithm"
From Geohashing
imported>Jevanyn (New page: Shouldn't this template be used as a way to flag locations that use an alternate algorithm? The warning seems more appropriate for the usage section of the template. -- ~~~~) |
imported>Robyn (Ajnins, perhaps?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this template be used as a way to flag locations that use an alternate algorithm? The warning seems more appropriate for the usage section of the template. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 21:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | Shouldn't this template be used as a way to flag locations that use an alternate algorithm? The warning seems more appropriate for the usage section of the template. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 21:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sounds like a good idea to me. Is any active graticule ''using'' an alternate algorithm? I was under the impression that they were the exclusive purvey of the people who are more interested in the theoretical aspects of geohashing than the actual pursuit of geohashes. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 01:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:23, 24 January 2009
Shouldn't this template be used as a way to flag locations that use an alternate algorithm? The warning seems more appropriate for the usage section of the template. -- Jevanyn 21:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Sounds like a good idea to me. Is any active graticule using an alternate algorithm? I was under the impression that they were the exclusive purvey of the people who are more interested in the theoretical aspects of geohashing than the actual pursuit of geohashes. -Robyn 01:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
