Difference between revisions of "Talk:Geohashing"
From Geohashing
imported>Robyn (This page is redundant.) |
imported>Robyn (As a two-line definition it made sense.) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think anything novel (perhaps the silliness/costuming aspect) should be moved to the FAQ, and the page turned into a redirect to Geohash. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 17:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC) | I think anything novel (perhaps the silliness/costuming aspect) should be moved to the FAQ, and the page turned into a redirect to Geohash. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 17:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I just looked at the history and see that it used to be a simple definition. I would vote to revert to that. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 17:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:33, 17 February 2009
As a definition, how is this page substantively different from the Geohash definition?
As an explanation, what are its benefits over the Main Page or the FAQ?
I think anything novel (perhaps the silliness/costuming aspect) should be moved to the FAQ, and the page turned into a redirect to Geohash. -Robyn 17:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
I just looked at the history and see that it used to be a simple definition. I would vote to revert to that. -Robyn 17:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)