Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stupidity distance"
From Geohashing
imported>Relet m (Talk:Stupidity Distance moved to Talk:Stupidity distance: Naming conventions) |
imported>Jevanyn (→Stupidity Inequality Hypothesis: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thanks for the phrase and definition, it should cut our report wording in half! :-) --[[User:Ncbears|NCBears]] 15:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | Thanks for the phrase and definition, it should cut our report wording in half! :-) --[[User:Ncbears|NCBears]] 15:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Stupidity Inequality Hypothesis == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I can refute this. On an expedition at night, my return path did not take me directly back to non-stupid territory. The way to the geohash was through a wooded park, but on the way out I emerged in an adjoining backyard, and had to cross between two houses to return to the street. I'd like to note that I ''had a GPS'', but it only indicated the location of the street, not the park boundaries or the houses. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] ([[User talk:Jevanyn|talk]]) 10:06, 6 March 2015 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 6 March 2015
Thanks for the phrase and definition, it should cut our report wording in half! :-) --NCBears 15:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Stupidity Inequality Hypothesis
I can refute this. On an expedition at night, my return path did not take me directly back to non-stupid territory. The way to the geohash was through a wooded park, but on the way out I emerged in an adjoining backyard, and had to cross between two houses to return to the street. I'd like to note that I had a GPS, but it only indicated the location of the street, not the park boundaries or the houses. -- Jevanyn (talk) 10:06, 6 March 2015 (EST)
