Difference between revisions of "Talk:XKCD-100 Honorable Mention"

Revision as of 22:27, 30 December 2012

Support - but I think that the "XKCD" should be removed from the name. -- RedHatter 22:32, 17 June 2012 (EDT) The reason for the name is that it steams from the main achievement XKCD-100 TunezNZ 23:41, 17 June 2012 (EDT)

Support - Good idea, why only have an achievement for Saturdays at 4? -- RedHatter 01:33, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Support - seems reasonable enough. You're still making the effort to go that far regardless of the date and time. -Haberdasher 01:55, 18 June 2012 (EDT)

Support - For pretty much the same reasons already listed. - DrCanadianNinja 11:53, 21 June 2012 (EDT)

Deletion tag

Reason stated: duplication on the main XKCD-100 page.

Reason for non-deletion: there is a copy on the main achievement page as it is based off it, It was done to get exposure so I piggybacked onto the main achievement. This page must exisit for this separate achievement to be valid.

This achievement also has unanimous support and when I'm back from camping I will now move to make this a propper achievement. I (unsigned contribution by User:TunezNZ)

You're right. But then I wonder why this was put onto the main XKCD-100 page without having been officially approved. No matter, deletion proposal withdrawn. --Calamus 17:27, 30 December 2012 (EST)

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 This achievement also has unanimous support and when I'm back from camping I will now move to make this a propper achievement.
-I
+I ''(unsigned contribution by [[User:TunezNZ]])''
+:You're right. But then I wonder why this was put onto the main XKCD-100 page without having been officially approved. No matter, deletion proposal withdrawn. --[[User:Calamus|Calamus]] 17:27, 30 December 2012 (EST)