Difference between revisions of "Talk:Polyhash achievement"
From Geohashing
imported>DODO (Created page with "*<b>Support.</b> It reminds me of the periodic table with the number of consecutive hashing days as the atomic number and the number of (reached/attempted?) hashes as the mass...") |
imported>Sourcerer m (→Oppose) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*<b>Support.</b> It reminds me of the periodic table with the number of consecutive hashing days as the atomic number and the number of (reached/attempted?) hashes as the mass number. So if you hash on 3 consecutive days and doing 2 double hashes during this time, you'd achieve a <sup>5</sup><sub>3</sub>Li (with a radioactive half-live of 3,047 × 10<sup>−22</sup>). I'd prefer to count only reached hashes (as for the consecutive and the multi hash achievement) but I wouldn't insist on that. [[User:DODO|DODO]] ([[User talk:DODO|talk]]) 13:12, 27 November 2015 (EST) | *<b>Support.</b> It reminds me of the periodic table with the number of consecutive hashing days as the atomic number and the number of (reached/attempted?) hashes as the mass number. So if you hash on 3 consecutive days and doing 2 double hashes during this time, you'd achieve a <sup>5</sup><sub>3</sub>Li (with a radioactive half-live of 3,047 × 10<sup>−22</sup>). I'd prefer to count only reached hashes (as for the consecutive and the multi hash achievement) but I wouldn't insist on that. [[User:DODO|DODO]] ([[User talk:DODO|talk]]) 13:12, 27 November 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | *<b>Oppose.</b> Can you oppose your own proposal? There is a lot of overlap between the polyhash and consecutive achievements. I think it makes more sense to use the consecutive ribbon with no change to the rules and add fields for the total number of attempts and coordinates reached. So you'd need to reach a hashpoint on each consecutive day. If you attempt or reach more the ribbon can record it. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 05:38, 19 December 2015 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 10:38, 19 December 2015
- Support. It reminds me of the periodic table with the number of consecutive hashing days as the atomic number and the number of (reached/attempted?) hashes as the mass number. So if you hash on 3 consecutive days and doing 2 double hashes during this time, you'd achieve a 53Li (with a radioactive half-live of 3,047 × 10−22). I'd prefer to count only reached hashes (as for the consecutive and the multi hash achievement) but I wouldn't insist on that. DODO (talk) 13:12, 27 November 2015 (EST)
- Oppose. Can you oppose your own proposal? There is a lot of overlap between the polyhash and consecutive achievements. I think it makes more sense to use the consecutive ribbon with no change to the rules and add fields for the total number of attempts and coordinates reached. So you'd need to reach a hashpoint on each consecutive day. If you attempt or reach more the ribbon can record it. --Sourcerer (talk) 05:38, 19 December 2015 (EST)
