Difference between revisions of "Talk:2016-12-31 48 16"

Revision as of 11:46, 6 January 2017

Haha, it sounds like more than "decent fun" ... I miss Vienna! And I will be sure to have a liquid sacher cake next time I visit, that sounds too bizarre not to try... -- OtherJack (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Hey there guys, nice to see such nice hashes from you. You probably quailifed for a leap second hash, have you been there at exactly midnight? (ftp://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/bulletinc.52) ---RecentlyChanged (talk)

Hi RecentlyChanged, nice to hear from you, and thanks for the reminder. And yes, we still were at the hashpoint at/after midnight, so I guess we would qualify for that leap hash. B2c (talk) 07:08, 6 January 2017 (GMT+1)

The leap second was at 23:59:60 UTC

In Vienna I think this means the leap second was at 00:59:60 local time so you should have been at 2017-01-01 48 16 at 1 o'clock in the morning! I made the opposite mistake. I was at 2017-01-01 52 0 for the leap second but I should have been at 2016-12-31 52 0. I visited both points, neither at the correct time. D'Oh! --Sourcerer (talk) 11:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Hi RecentlyChanged, nice to hear from you, and thanks for the reminder. And yes, we still were at the hashpoint at/after midnight, so I guess we would qualify for that leap hash. [[User:B2c|B2c]] ([[User talk:B2c|talk]]) 07:08, 6 January 2017 (GMT+1)
+== The leap second was at 23:59:60 UTC ==
+In Vienna I think this means the leap second was at 00:59:60 local time so you should have been at [[2017-01-01 48 16]] at 1 o'clock in the morning! I made the opposite mistake. I was at [[2017-01-01 52 0]] for the leap second but I should have been at [[2016-12-31 52 0]]. I visited both points, neither at the correct time. D'Oh! --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 11:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)