Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Mexico"
From Geohashing
imported>Moose Hole m |
imported>Benjw (how should we organise Mexican graticules?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I made redirects for all of the Mexican states with accent marks, except México, since I'm already using Mexico for the country. | I made redirects for all of the Mexican states with accent marks, except México, since I'm already using Mexico for the country. | ||
-- [[User:Moose Hole|Moose Hole]] 17:56 19 June 2008 (UTC) | -- [[User:Moose Hole|Moose Hole]] 17:56 19 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is there an established format for Mexican graticules? At the moment they seem to be named "Town, Mexico" (although some are "Town, México"), but are categorised into individual states (although some just have the country category). Should the pages be listed by state (as per the USA and Canada) rather than country? Should we keep the state categories or just use the country? I'd like to tidy it all up but am unsure what I think is best. It's a big country, but some of the states are really tiny. Any thoughts? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 12:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:53, 22 April 2009
I made redirects for all of the Mexican states with accent marks, except México, since I'm already using Mexico for the country. -- Moose Hole 17:56 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Is there an established format for Mexican graticules? At the moment they seem to be named "Town, Mexico" (although some are "Town, México"), but are categorised into individual states (although some just have the country category). Should the pages be listed by state (as per the USA and Canada) rather than country? Should we keep the state categories or just use the country? I'd like to tidy it all up but am unsure what I think is best. It's a big country, but some of the states are really tiny. Any thoughts? -- Benjw 12:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
