Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Alternate algorithm"
From Geohashing
imported>Robyn (Ajnins, perhaps?) |
imported>Jevanyn (Israel and Puerto Rico have something in common....) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sounds like a good idea to me. Is any active graticule ''using'' an alternate algorithm? I was under the impression that they were the exclusive purvey of the people who are more interested in the theoretical aspects of geohashing than the actual pursuit of geohashes. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 01:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | Sounds like a good idea to me. Is any active graticule ''using'' an alternate algorithm? I was under the impression that they were the exclusive purvey of the people who are more interested in the theoretical aspects of geohashing than the actual pursuit of geohashes. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 01:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Israel]] seems to be actively using one. [[San Juan, Puerto Rico]] is not active, but if it becomes so, it's a good example since it's a relatively rectangular island. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 15:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:01, 26 January 2009
Shouldn't this template be used as a way to flag locations that use an alternate algorithm? The warning seems more appropriate for the usage section of the template. -- Jevanyn 21:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Sounds like a good idea to me. Is any active graticule using an alternate algorithm? I was under the impression that they were the exclusive purvey of the people who are more interested in the theoretical aspects of geohashing than the actual pursuit of geohashes. -Robyn 01:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Israel seems to be actively using one. San Juan, Puerto Rico is not active, but if it becomes so, it's a good example since it's a relatively rectangular island. -- Jevanyn 15:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
