Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-04-19 49 8"
From Geohashing
imported>Euterkuh |
imported>Ncbears (Geo-donkeys!) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Well, the GPS device didn't show the correct coordinates (the 4th position after decimal point was a bit off), so I don't think it was a success. It was just very close :-/ [[User:Euterkuh|Euterkuh]] 18:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | Well, the GPS device didn't show the correct coordinates (the 4th position after decimal point was a bit off), so I don't think it was a success. It was just very close :-/ [[User:Euterkuh|Euterkuh]] 18:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I'd of said it was within the margin of accuracy...but great attempt either way. Love the geodonkeys! -- [[User:Ncbears|NCBears]] 20:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:40, 19 April 2009
Aw, man! Good report, good try, good geocitizenship. I can't believe that guy didn't let you come in for two metres! Most GPS units are only accurate to about 3 metres, so I don't think anyone would object if you took it as a success. But you get to decide. -Robyn 17:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, the GPS device didn't show the correct coordinates (the 4th position after decimal point was a bit off), so I don't think it was a success. It was just very close :-/ Euterkuh 18:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'd of said it was within the margin of accuracy...but great attempt either way. Love the geodonkeys! -- NCBears 20:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)