Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Graticule"
From Geohashing
imported>Spike |
imported>Duskwolf (split cities = :() |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: I would also wonder how to do this. For example, I'm in the [[Lincoln, NE]] graticule. Neighboring me to the north and northeast are the two graticules for Omaha, which is a split city with a single page. Ideally, I'd like it to link to the Omaha page with each, but have West/East in parentheses next to the link within the table. Can this be done? [[User:Spike|Spike]] 06:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | : I would also wonder how to do this. For example, I'm in the [[Lincoln, NE]] graticule. Neighboring me to the north and northeast are the two graticules for Omaha, which is a split city with a single page. Ideally, I'd like it to link to the Omaha page with each, but have West/East in parentheses next to the link within the table. Can this be done? [[User:Spike|Spike]] 06:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Split cities are a weird issue - they violate the "one graticule = one page" rule. (Note in particular that the Omaha graticule page will get spectacularly broken when something shows up to its north.) I'd be inclined to split the page into [[Omaha East, Nebraska]] and [[Omaha West, Nebraska]] or similar - Omaha is the problem here, not Lincoln. [[User:Duskwolf|Duskwolf]] 08:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
I think it would look cleaner if the surrounds are above the map (i.e. so users don't have to scroll down to see the neighbors). --[[User:KDinCT|KDinCT]] 02:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | I think it would look cleaner if the surrounds are above the map (i.e. so users don't have to scroll down to see the neighbors). --[[User:KDinCT|KDinCT]] 02:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:19, 22 May 2008
The bottom graticule neighbourhood being automatically a link means that I can't seem to use alternate text for the link. Could you make the names plain text (or otherwise tell me how to use alternate link text), please? -- Marz 00:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm. What did you need that for? I'd prefer to not have to make users link neighboring graticules manually - ideally, there's some way to make the Right Thing happen on its own. Duskwolf 01:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ideally, article names should specify a single key city, not a set of cities - Birmingham East / Leicester / Coventry, United Kingdom should probably be renamed to Birmingham East, United Kingdom, for example. It's still pretty long, but much more manageable. Duskwolf 02:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- I would also wonder how to do this. For example, I'm in the Lincoln, NE graticule. Neighboring me to the north and northeast are the two graticules for Omaha, which is a split city with a single page. Ideally, I'd like it to link to the Omaha page with each, but have West/East in parentheses next to the link within the table. Can this be done? Spike 06:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Split cities are a weird issue - they violate the "one graticule = one page" rule. (Note in particular that the Omaha graticule page will get spectacularly broken when something shows up to its north.) I'd be inclined to split the page into Omaha East, Nebraska and Omaha West, Nebraska or similar - Omaha is the problem here, not Lincoln. Duskwolf 08:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I think it would look cleaner if the surrounds are above the map (i.e. so users don't have to scroll down to see the neighbors). --KDinCT 02:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's an excellent idea. So excellent, in fact, that I just implemented it. Duskwolf 02:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Beautiful! --KDinCT 02:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
It'd probably look better if you left-align the left column entries, and right-align the right ones. And if people would use the state name abbreviations instead of the full names it wouldn't look so squashed. We'd only need to set up a few redirects then. Tyler 02:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Done. And some site-wide talk about naming conventions wouldn't be unwise - standardize on what abbreviations should be used and whatnot. Duskwolf 03:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
