Difference between revisions of "Talk:St. Louis, Missouri"
From Geohashing
imported>Space cadet dan |
imported>Histumness |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't the St. Louis graticule be 38, -90? 38, -91 is too far west and doesn't contain any of St. Louis, St. Louis county or even St. Charles or O'Fallon. [[User:Histumness|Histumness]] 14:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | Shouldn't the St. Louis graticule be 38, -90? 38, -91 is too far west and doesn't contain any of St. Louis, St. Louis county or even St. Charles or O'Fallon. [[User:Histumness|Histumness]] 14:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
: That may be a problem with the graticule template. I think the reference implementation shows the St. Louis graticule at 38, -91. --[[User:Space cadet dan|Space Cadet Dan]] 15:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | : That may be a problem with the graticule template. I think the reference implementation shows the St. Louis graticule at 38, -91. --[[User:Space cadet dan|Space Cadet Dan]] 15:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: Ohh okay. For some reason I was thinking the graticules were named by the northwestern coordinates. This way makes more sense though. [[User:Histumness|Histumness]] 13:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 24 May 2008
Shouldn't the St. Louis graticule be 38, -90? 38, -91 is too far west and doesn't contain any of St. Louis, St. Louis county or even St. Charles or O'Fallon. Histumness 14:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- That may be a problem with the graticule template. I think the reference implementation shows the St. Louis graticule at 38, -91. --Space Cadet Dan 15:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ohh okay. For some reason I was thinking the graticules were named by the northwestern coordinates. This way makes more sense though. Histumness 13:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
