Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010-02-11 34.52 -110.10 (Unofficial)"
From Geohashing
imported>Benjw (page name is unconventional -- what do we do about alternative algorithms?) |
imported>Ekorren (It's not a geohashing expedition at all, so it doesn't need any title. Definitely not one of the official namespace.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I've just come across this page. My instinct is that, even though you are using an alternative algorithm to generate the coordinates, it should still be titled "2010-02-11 34 -110". But I don't think we've ever had an actual expedition using an alternative algorithm before (someone will correct me if I'm wrong, I'm sure). What do others think? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 14:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | I've just come across this page. My instinct is that, even though you are using an alternative algorithm to generate the coordinates, it should still be titled "2010-02-11 34 -110". But I don't think we've ever had an actual expedition using an alternative algorithm before (someone will correct me if I'm wrong, I'm sure). What do others think? -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 14:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I just think that alternative algorithms should not be used. It might be a great trip totally worth the effort, but it's not a ''geohashing expedition'' if you go somewhere else. So it definitely shouldn't be named or categorized as a geohashing expedition either. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 15:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:23, 25 July 2010
Page name
I've just come across this page. My instinct is that, even though you are using an alternative algorithm to generate the coordinates, it should still be titled "2010-02-11 34 -110". But I don't think we've ever had an actual expedition using an alternative algorithm before (someone will correct me if I'm wrong, I'm sure). What do others think? -- Benjw 14:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- I just think that alternative algorithms should not be used. It might be a great trip totally worth the effort, but it's not a geohashing expedition if you go somewhere else. So it definitely shouldn't be named or categorized as a geohashing expedition either. --Ekorren 15:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
