Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-03-23 52 0"
imported>Jiml (I'd say you made it.) |
imported>Splitdipless |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I'd say you made it. If you didn't have a GPS, and were using Google Maps, I can't imagine you'd be anymore | I'd say you made it. If you didn't have a GPS, and were using Google Maps, I can't imagine you'd be anymore | ||
accurately "there". [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 01:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC) | accurately "there". [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 01:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Don't take our word for it. [[GPS_Accuracy]] spells out exactly how accurate you may be. In general, your device is always a little less accurate then what it says it is. Based on the description, you absolutely got it. [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 17:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:56, 31 August 2010
Arbitration needed
... I walked up to the gate to the back garden, at which point the GPS read 3.65m to go. I didn't want to open the gate and charge into their back garden without permission, so I didn't go any further, but I noticed when I got back to the car that the GPS accuracy was hovering around 4m. So... did I get the geohash or not?
Would welcome other geohashers' opinions on this. Thanks. — Benjw [talk] 11:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Personally I think it's first of all a matter of the geohasher himself being convinced that he reached the coordinates, but you may also want to check the comments here. --Crox 21:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I'd say you made it. If you didn't have a GPS, and were using Google Maps, I can't imagine you'd be anymore accurately "there". Jiml 01:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Don't take our word for it. GPS_Accuracy spells out exactly how accurate you may be. In general, your device is always a little less accurate then what it says it is. Based on the description, you absolutely got it. Splitdipless 17:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
