Difference between revisions of "Talk:2011-12-19 42 -88"
From Geohashing
imported>RocketMac |
imported>RocketMac |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:NWoodruff|NWoodruff]], I concur with your numbers as my work shows. Last night I verified this on [http://activegeohasher.com/geohash/2011-12-19/42/-88 AG] to be sure. I'm about to add a map point. I don't know why the auto map has that point there. [[User:RocketMac|RocketMac]] 12:38, 20 December 2011 (EST) | [[User:NWoodruff|NWoodruff]], I concur with your numbers as my work shows. Last night I verified this on [http://activegeohasher.com/geohash/2011-12-19/42/-88 AG] to be sure. I'm about to add a map point. I don't know why the auto map has that point there. [[User:RocketMac|RocketMac]] 12:38, 20 December 2011 (EST) | ||
| − | [[User:relet|relet]], sadly I didn't think of the Tale of Two Hashes until I read your post just now. But... | + | [[User:relet|relet]], sadly I didn't think of the Tale of Two Hashes until I read your post just now. But...would "Berlin" count for "New Berlin"? [[User:RocketMac|RocketMac]] 12:38, 20 December 2011 (EST) |
And with that, I award myself... | And with that, I award myself... | ||
Latest revision as of 21:50, 20 December 2011
Your numbers are off. Today's point west of -30 are .9655473, .1117935 --NWoodruff 17:31, 19 December 2011 (EST)
Are they? If not, you could issue a pretty feasible Tale of Two Hashes challenge for Berlin. They have just been a bit lazy lately. -- relet 06:11, 20 December 2011 (EST)
NWoodruff, I concur with your numbers as my work shows. Last night I verified this on AG to be sure. I'm about to add a map point. I don't know why the auto map has that point there. RocketMac 12:38, 20 December 2011 (EST)
relet, sadly I didn't think of the Tale of Two Hashes until I read your post just now. But...would "Berlin" count for "New Berlin"? RocketMac 12:38, 20 December 2011 (EST)
And with that, I award myself...
 |
RocketMac earned the Pseudo Celebrity Status award
|
