Difference between revisions of "Talk:2013-09-17 45 -122"

From Geohashing
imported>Jiml
(Counter-point)
imported>Frogman
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
: That certainly would have been more accessible, but is also in Forest Grove. [[User:Frogman|Frogman]] ([[User talk:Frogman|talk]]) 00:23, 19 September 2013 (EDT)
 
: That certainly would have been more accessible, but is also in Forest Grove. [[User:Frogman|Frogman]] ([[User talk:Frogman|talk]]) 00:23, 19 September 2013 (EDT)
 
::"And what's wrong with Forest Grove?", asks the person who went to the hashpoint there.  [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] ([[User talk:Jiml|talk]]) 00:58, 19 September 2013 (EDT)
 
::"And what's wrong with Forest Grove?", asks the person who went to the hashpoint there.  [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] ([[User talk:Jiml|talk]]) 00:58, 19 September 2013 (EDT)
 +
:::The two-hour travel time associated with going there. [[User:Frogman|Frogman]] ([[User talk:Frogman|talk]]) 00:25, 20 September 2013 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 04:25, 20 September 2013

And here I was wondering if you were exploring downtown Forest Grove. Michael5000 (talk) 10:51, 18 September 2013 (EDT)

That certainly would have been more accessible, but is also in Forest Grove. Frogman (talk) 00:23, 19 September 2013 (EDT)
"And what's wrong with Forest Grove?", asks the person who went to the hashpoint there. Jiml (talk) 00:58, 19 September 2013 (EDT)
The two-hour travel time associated with going there. Frogman (talk) 00:25, 20 September 2013 (EDT)