Difference between revisions of "Talk:2015-02-25 52 1"
From Geohashing
imported>DODO (Created page with "Excellent. Just keep going. This one and just one more and you will equalize Nathans old record. And still 3 days to go. I keep my fingers cross for you (although Mannheim wil...") |
imported>Sourcerer m (→Comment reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Excellent. Just keep going. This one and just one more and you will equalize Nathans old record. And still 3 days to go. I keep my fingers cross for you (although Mannheim will never gain the most-active-graticule-achievement again if you stay this active ;-). [[User:DODO|DODO]] ([[User talk:DODO|talk]]) | Excellent. Just keep going. This one and just one more and you will equalize Nathans old record. And still 3 days to go. I keep my fingers cross for you (although Mannheim will never gain the most-active-graticule-achievement again if you stay this active ;-). [[User:DODO|DODO]] ([[User talk:DODO|talk]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Oops. I only just spotted this 4 months late. When I saw some comments along the lines that no one would ever beat the Atlanta records I wondered why not. If I can, in a graticule that is 43% ocean, I'd expect the records to be re-broken and perhaps soon. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 06:45, 30 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:45, 30 June 2015
Excellent. Just keep going. This one and just one more and you will equalize Nathans old record. And still 3 days to go. I keep my fingers cross for you (although Mannheim will never gain the most-active-graticule-achievement again if you stay this active ;-). DODO (talk)
- Oops. I only just spotted this 4 months late. When I saw some comments along the lines that no one would ever beat the Atlanta records I wondered why not. If I can, in a graticule that is 43% ocean, I'd expect the records to be re-broken and perhaps soon. --Sourcerer (talk) 06:45, 30 June 2015 (EDT)
