Difference between revisions of "Talk:2015-07-20 52 0"

From Geohashing
imported>Sourcerer
m (Not a tale of two hashes)
imported>Thomcat
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Would you say this geohash was on an English Hill? Because I am today going to a development called Glenshire at English Hill. Would make a good "tale of two geohashes" same day pairing... --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 14:38, 20 July 2015 (EDT)
 
Would you say this geohash was on an English Hill? Because I am today going to a development called Glenshire at English Hill. Would make a good "tale of two geohashes" same day pairing... --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 14:38, 20 July 2015 (EDT)
 
: Not really. The terrain was pretty flat. The contour lines showed a slight gradient but most of England is like that. I think this one is a bit weak. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 12:20, 23 July 2015 (EDT)
 
: Not really. The terrain was pretty flat. The contour lines showed a slight gradient but most of England is like that. I think this one is a bit weak. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 12:20, 23 July 2015 (EDT)
 +
::Please keep [[2015-07-20_47_-122|this]] in mind for future English Hills, Glens or Shires :)  --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 14:18, 23 July 2015 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:18, 23 July 2015

Would you say this geohash was on an English Hill? Because I am today going to a development called Glenshire at English Hill. Would make a good "tale of two geohashes" same day pairing... --Thomcat (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2015 (EDT)

Not really. The terrain was pretty flat. The contour lines showed a slight gradient but most of England is like that. I think this one is a bit weak. --Sourcerer (talk) 12:20, 23 July 2015 (EDT)
Please keep this in mind for future English Hills, Glens or Shires :) --Thomcat (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2015 (EDT)