Difference between revisions of "Talk:2015-07-20 52 0"
From Geohashing
imported>Sourcerer m (→Not a tale of two hashes) |
imported>Thomcat |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would you say this geohash was on an English Hill? Because I am today going to a development called Glenshire at English Hill. Would make a good "tale of two geohashes" same day pairing... --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 14:38, 20 July 2015 (EDT) | Would you say this geohash was on an English Hill? Because I am today going to a development called Glenshire at English Hill. Would make a good "tale of two geohashes" same day pairing... --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 14:38, 20 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
: Not really. The terrain was pretty flat. The contour lines showed a slight gradient but most of England is like that. I think this one is a bit weak. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 12:20, 23 July 2015 (EDT) | : Not really. The terrain was pretty flat. The contour lines showed a slight gradient but most of England is like that. I think this one is a bit weak. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 12:20, 23 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
+ | ::Please keep [[2015-07-20_47_-122|this]] in mind for future English Hills, Glens or Shires :) --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] ([[User talk:Thomcat|talk]]) 14:18, 23 July 2015 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 18:18, 23 July 2015
Would you say this geohash was on an English Hill? Because I am today going to a development called Glenshire at English Hill. Would make a good "tale of two geohashes" same day pairing... --Thomcat (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2015 (EDT)