Difference between revisions of "Talk:Norwich, United Kingdom Statistics"
From Geohashing
imported>Jevanyn (Created page with ""Aha!" said the researcher, then disappeared in a puff of logic. -- ~~~") |
imported>Sourcerer m (→Logic puff) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Aha!" said the researcher, then disappeared in a puff of logic. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] ([[User talk:Jevanyn|talk]]) | "Aha!" said the researcher, then disappeared in a puff of logic. -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] ([[User talk:Jevanyn|talk]]) | ||
| + | :It's complicated. I'd like to beat the 2009 Atlanta, most active graticule record. There have been a couple of quite unlucky months. I'm trying to outwit "sod's law" or quantum inconvenience. By monitoring the statistics closely, it's like toast. If I monitor the stat's and get roughly average results, I should beat the Atlanta record. Otherwise my run of bad luck might continue. Of course this is all complete nonsense in the true spirit of geohashing. --[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 06:49, 22 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 22 October 2015
"Aha!" said the researcher, then disappeared in a puff of logic. -- Jevanyn (talk)
- It's complicated. I'd like to beat the 2009 Atlanta, most active graticule record. There have been a couple of quite unlucky months. I'm trying to outwit "sod's law" or quantum inconvenience. By monitoring the statistics closely, it's like toast. If I monitor the stat's and get roughly average results, I should beat the Atlanta record. Otherwise my run of bad luck might continue. Of course this is all complete nonsense in the true spirit of geohashing. --Sourcerer (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
