Difference between revisions of "Talk:2016-02-29 41 -79"
From Geohashing
imported>Tilley (Created page with "An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis -part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get B...") |
imported>Pedalpusher (comment!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis -part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get Blinded by Science -ribbon, since you told you based your decision of following the wrong path on the satellite images. [[User:Tilley|Tilley]] ([[User talk:Tilley|talk]]) 08:41, 3 March 2016 (EST) | An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis -part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get Blinded by Science -ribbon, since you told you based your decision of following the wrong path on the satellite images. [[User:Tilley|Tilley]] ([[User talk:Tilley|talk]]) 08:41, 3 March 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Thanks, Tilley. I know it's a long read, but I do feel better just getting all that out there. Glad you agree with the ribbon. Any thoughts on the not reached Category? I'm starting to think both are valid. [[User:Pedalpusher|Pedalpusher]] ([[User talk:Pedalpusher|talk]]) 09:24, 3 March 2016 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:24, 3 March 2016
An exceptionally detailed report, I especially liked the analysis -part. Too bad you were that close reaching the hash, but still didn't make it. I agree that you should get Blinded by Science -ribbon, since you told you based your decision of following the wrong path on the satellite images. Tilley (talk) 08:41, 3 March 2016 (EST)
- Thanks, Tilley. I know it's a long read, but I do feel better just getting all that out there. Glad you agree with the ribbon. Any thoughts on the not reached Category? I'm starting to think both are valid. Pedalpusher (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2016 (EST)
