Talk:Fibonacci achievement

Oppose. We already have Two to the N, and I don't see the point of having two different ways of counting the same thing. If it was counting something different, I might support. --PeterRoder (talk) 22:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Oppose. Would not oppose it if it was combined with the Two to the N achievement to make a general counting achievement, but this may be controversial amongst people who enjoy that achievement as it is. This suggestion alone does not have enough uniqueness for an achievement. --KerrMcF (talk) 02:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Possible Addition to Two to the N

I've made a gratuitous ribbon to demonstrate what this achievement would look like if paired with the Two to the N achievement. This would not alter the previous or future ribbons for the Two to the N achievement but due to the similarities between the two achievements, it makes sense to add it as an additional feature. I have not changed the Two to the N achievement but would be willing to do so should this be supported. Due to the nature of the gratuitous ribbons, the achievement text does not match 1-to-1. This would not be the case for the actual achievement. The achievement would use the format F₀ = 0, F₁ = 1, F₂ = 1, F₃ = 2, etc.

{{Two to the N achievement | count = 3 | latitude = 56 | longitude = -3 | date = 2024-02-20 | name = KerrMcF | reached = true }}

appears as:

KerrMcF earned the Two to the N achievement by reaching 23 hashpoints on 2024-02-20 56 -3 and is promoted to Level 3 (Coordinates reached).

Adding true to a 'fibonacci' factor would change the achievement:

{{Two to the N achievement | count = 6 | latitude = 56 | longitude = -3 | date = 2024-02-20 | name = KerrMcF | reached = true | fibonacci = true }}

would appear as:

KerrMcF earned the Fibonacci achievement by reaching F6 hashpoints on 2024-02-20 56 -3 and is promoted to Level 6 (Coordinates reached). (56, -3) geohash on 2024-02-20.