Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nanny consolation prize"

From Geohashing
(opinion)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
'''Support''' Seems fine. Though can be a bit of a grey area between someone "needing looking after" vs just not wanting to do it. [[User:Stevage|Stevage]] ([[User talk:Stevage|talk]]) 02:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 
'''Support''' Seems fine. Though can be a bit of a grey area between someone "needing looking after" vs just not wanting to do it. [[User:Stevage|Stevage]] ([[User talk:Stevage|talk]]) 02:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 +
 +
What I don't like about this is that it is a proxy reason, when I think the real reason should be given. Did the companion refuse to go along because of natural obstacles? DWN. Did they run out of time? White Rabbit. Etc. Since that is the true reason the expedition did not succeed, I believe one of the existing consolation prizes should be claimed rather than creating this one. --[[User:Fippe|Fippe]] ([[User talk:Fippe|talk]]) 09:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:51, 27 July 2024

No comments since 2009 - it's in limbo! I have removed the link from the Achievement list --Sourcerer (talk) 08:55, 22 July 2015 (EDT)

Oppose. I'll try to figure out my exact reasoning at a later date, but it's likely related to the nature of the situation itself. --KerrMcF (talk) 00:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Support Seems fine. Though can be a bit of a grey area between someone "needing looking after" vs just not wanting to do it. Stevage (talk) 02:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

What I don't like about this is that it is a proxy reason, when I think the real reason should be given. Did the companion refuse to go along because of natural obstacles? DWN. Did they run out of time? White Rabbit. Etc. Since that is the true reason the expedition did not succeed, I believe one of the existing consolation prizes should be claimed rather than creating this one. --Fippe (talk) 09:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)