Talk:2015-08-02 48 16
What are you guys up to? Reports are very, how should I put it, compact. Tilley (talk) 10:43, 2 August 2015 (EDT)
- Indeed, this looks like the start of quite an epic event. I hope you guys expand on all the reports after you get some rest. I'm looking forward to it. Pedalpusher (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2015 (EDT)
Thanks guys for the positive feedback. We're still going strong, who knows where the adventure will take us next -- Micsnare is typing this on a notebook while B2c is driving.... Guys, watch this space!!! Micsnare (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2015 (CEST)
I'm speechless. Tilley (talk) 13:31, 2 August 2015 (EDT)
What the... Why is the main page full of pictures of you three? And you are still not finished, as it seems. Are you crazy? Hooray! - Danatar (talk) 09:46, 2 August 2015 (EDT)
Ok, you catched me curious. At least eight geohashes on one day. I'm eager to read the reports. - TheOneRing (talk) 2015-08-02T17:26+02:00
Ahhh..... GRAND. EPIC. FABULOUS!1PE (Canberra) (talk) 00:18, 3 August 2015 (EDT)
Really, you Austrian guys are nuts! In a good, geohashing-type way! Btw, not only did you top Bysmyyr's 10-hashpoint record he did by flying, you topped his speed! His aeroplane can't go 220 km/h :) Tilley (talk) 03:43, 3 August 2015 (EDT)
- Haha, thx Tilley, that really made me laugh hard. And yes, we really put that old piece of scrap to the test for this one :D--B2c (talk) 11:10, 3 August 2015 (CEST)
Table of awesomeness
| Lat/Lon 2015-08-02 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 49 | B | B | 5 09:51 |
6 11:56 |
7 13:23 |
8 14:57 |
9 16:50 |
| 48 | 4 06:36 |
3 04:24 |
2 02:41 |
1 00:47 |
A | 11 Start: 22:00h, End: 20:48 |
10 18:53 |
- A - Inaccessible mountain forest.
- B - Backup hashpoint, not visited.
Epic day out. Is this a record? --Sourcerer (talk) 04:20, 3 August 2015 (EDT)
- To my knowledge this would be a new record for most hashes visited in one day. Also: Thanks for the cool table, I changed it around a bit and added the correct time for the third hash. I also uploaded proof for the third hash to the corresponding page. --B2c (talk) 11:05, 3 August 2015 (CEST)
Looking at the table, (great representation, btw) I'm curious why you didn't stop at the 49, 12 in-between hash #4 and #5? Wasn't that close to being on the way to #5? Pedalpusher (talk) 17:01, 3 August 2015 (EDT)
