Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-03-08 33 -85"
From Geohashing
imported>Danatar (New page: Hooray for time-travelling! A great writeup! Waiting for the pictures, I can almost feel your hour-long suspense. - ~~~~) |
imported>CJ (Well done!) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hooray for time-travelling! A great writeup! Waiting for the pictures, I can almost feel your hour-long suspense. - [[User:Danatar|Danatar]] 08:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | Hooray for time-travelling! A great writeup! Waiting for the pictures, I can almost feel your hour-long suspense. - [[User:Danatar|Danatar]] 08:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Hall of Amazingness== | ||
| + | We're also considering linking from the [[Hall of Amazingness]], probably as lucky locations. Is it amazing enough? --[[User:Woodveil|Woodveil]] 17:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :It turns out you were at the second hashpoint not at the same time, but earlier, I'm not sure if that counts... | ||
| + | :Just kidding ;-) In my opinion everything within 59 seconds is "at the same time", and 3 seconds is just awesome (and that at the speed you were going!). As the first time-travellers, you may definitely add it to the Hall of Amazingness. I think it fits best under "Setting New Records" - [[User:Danatar|Danatar]] 18:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Very nicely done. At first when I saw this I thought, "whaa? they're stupid! the clocks went forward this weekend!" but then I realized you did it without benefit of a time change. This makes up for the hour you lost Saturday night. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 19:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Amazing, I'm impressed!!! :) -[[User:JRK|JRK]] 19:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::As long as we give them credit for being at the first hash three seconds before they left it, they were at the two locations at '''exactly''' the same time. Bravo, guys. Red capes all around. --[[User:Starbird|starbird]] 19:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Absolutely amazing and worthy of the honor! Great job guys! -- [[User:Ncbears|NCBears]] 23:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Amazing is the word that occurred to me. Well done. Thanks for sharing. --[[User:Bos|Bos]] 21:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Brilliant write-up and an exciting expedition! Definitely worthy of Hall of Amazingness. --[[User:CJ|CJ]] 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:03, 10 March 2009
Hooray for time-travelling! A great writeup! Waiting for the pictures, I can almost feel your hour-long suspense. - Danatar 08:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Hall of Amazingness
We're also considering linking from the Hall of Amazingness, probably as lucky locations. Is it amazing enough? --Woodveil 17:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- It turns out you were at the second hashpoint not at the same time, but earlier, I'm not sure if that counts...
- Just kidding ;-) In my opinion everything within 59 seconds is "at the same time", and 3 seconds is just awesome (and that at the speed you were going!). As the first time-travellers, you may definitely add it to the Hall of Amazingness. I think it fits best under "Setting New Records" - Danatar 18:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Very nicely done. At first when I saw this I thought, "whaa? they're stupid! the clocks went forward this weekend!" but then I realized you did it without benefit of a time change. This makes up for the hour you lost Saturday night. -Robyn 19:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Amazing, I'm impressed!!! :) -JRK 19:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- As long as we give them credit for being at the first hash three seconds before they left it, they were at the two locations at exactly the same time. Bravo, guys. Red capes all around. --starbird 19:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Absolutely amazing and worthy of the honor! Great job guys! -- NCBears 23:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Amazing is the word that occurred to me. Well done. Thanks for sharing. --Bos 21:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Brilliant write-up and an exciting expedition! Definitely worthy of Hall of Amazingness. --CJ 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
