Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boston, Massachusetts"
From Geohashing
imported>Tjtrumpet2323 (→Rename) |
imported>Tjtrumpet2323 m (→Layout: omg - please don't create a fake namespace) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
How about inversing the geohashes so the most recent is at the top? Any thoughts? -- | How about inversing the geohashes so the most recent is at the top? Any thoughts? -- | ||
[[User:Loch|Loch]] | [[User:Loch|Loch]] | ||
| − | :Agreed. I made the change. At some point (perhaps in a few weeks) we should also change to showing the most recent 8(?) or so hashes, and have the rest at [[Boston | + | :Agreed. I made the change. At some point (perhaps in a few weeks) we should also change to showing the most recent 8(?) or so hashes, and have the rest at [[Boston/Archive]].--[[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] 20:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
<HR> | <HR> | ||
Revision as of 20:46, 7 July 2008
Rename
Using the naming conventions, I've corrected most of the graticules in North America, and other editors have done the rest. The only remaining holdout is Boston.
Proposal - move this page/talk combination (and correct all links) to Boston, Massachusetts. Comments? --Thomcat 14:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- One is a redirect to the other right now... all it would take is a "MOVE" to flip that around. That way, there would be no disruption to those who use this page frequently. Fixing all the pointing links around the wiki wouldn't be so crucial, but would probably also be a good thing. --Tim P 20:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Layout
How about inversing the geohashes so the most recent is at the top? Any thoughts? -- Loch
- Agreed. I made the change. At some point (perhaps in a few weeks) we should also change to showing the most recent 8(?) or so hashes, and have the rest at Boston/Archive.--Ahecht 20:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
How about putting the geohashers in alpha sort? Any thoughts?
