Difference between revisions of "Talk:Migration Geohash"

From Geohashing
imported>UnwiseOwl
m (Spelling is not my strong point)
imported>Robyn
(Should it stay then?)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 
-- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
That's what I mean, it's an achievement that no one is going to get unless they live in San Francisco or Boston.  No one has wanted to even make a page for it. It's not inspiring anyone. Every time I look at the red link and try to make a page for it I just think "meh." It would be migration if you met the fifty people in different graticules. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:35, 30 October 2008

Okay, this achievement has been listed on the main page for a long time and no one has wanted it or made a page for it. That's because no one thinks they'll ever see 50 people at a geohash.

So should we delete it, or change it to meeting 50 geohashers, cumulatively, one at a time if necessary? -Robyn 03:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, that wouldn't be migration. I figure this could only happen if the hash occurred at a major event, and the count included non-hashers. I like the idea of a meeting hashers award, but see it as something quite different to this.

Hashers in my grat:3

Hashers I've met:1 (It was me)

-- UnwiseOwl 04:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

That's what I mean, it's an achievement that no one is going to get unless they live in San Francisco or Boston. No one has wanted to even make a page for it. It's not inspiring anyone. Every time I look at the red link and try to make a page for it I just think "meh." It would be migration if you met the fifty people in different graticules. -Robyn 04:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)